nursemommyapcs9so nursemommyapcs9so
  • 01-08-2018
  • History
contestada

how was congress handicapped because of the following court cases: Hammer v. Dagenhart(1918) and Bailey v Drexel Furniture Co (1922).

Respuesta :

DukeMoseti
DukeMoseti DukeMoseti
  • 15-08-2018

Congress was handicapped as its legislation was deemed as unconstitutional exercise of power. In Hammer v. Dagenhart, the Supreme Court held that the law passed by Congress in 1916 was an inappropriate exercise of constitutional power granted by the commerce clause while in Bailey v. Drexel, the law was found to be in unconstitutional exercise of taxing power

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

In Section 8, which clause gives Congress the most general, non-specific powers?
Prove the identity cot^2x/cscx+1=1-sinx/sinx
Which undefined terms are needed to define parallel lines? a. Point, lineB. Point, coplanarC. Line, planeD. Coplanar, line
A chemical that causes a sudden, almost instantaneous release of pressure, gas and heat when subjected to sudden shock, pressure or high temperatures best descr
Explain the bakke case how did it begin and how did it end?
What number should be placed in the box to help complete the division calculation
Write a balanced chemical equation for the photosynthesis reaction in which gaseous carbon dioxide and liquid water react in the presence of chlorophyll to prod
Who was opposed to the governments establishing of the bank
Scientific theories are more like laws than hypotheses. True False
Modern : antiquated :: weak :