hjmejm37 hjmejm37
  • 01-03-2021
  • History
contestada

who believed a bill of rights would be redundant and unnecessary- federalists or antifederalists ​

Respuesta :

emarithomas32 emarithomas32
  • 01-03-2021

Answer:

The Federalist

Explanation:

They argued that the constitution did not need a bill of rights because the people and the states kept any power not given to the federal government.

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

I need help with this guysss
which process divides the chromosomes in the cell before dividing? A. mitosis only B. meiosis only C. both mitosis and meiosis
what happens if you fail orchestra in middle school
Still the single bloodiest day in American History and saw over ten thousand Americans killed? Fort Sumpter Antietam Gettysburg
Explain why Plan B is the better choice for Dylan if he only has $50 to spend on video games, including a membership fee.
Tell me about something you wrote and how it related to science
Can you please help me?
Yo _________ en la clase de español. (hablar)
can someone help me understand this problem?​
(14 points)Was the attack on Pearl Harbor a valid reason for the United States to enter World War II? Explain why or why not.